Alternative Dispute Resilution Mechanisms in the Field of Public Procurement: Between Effectiveness and Constitutionalily

Dacian DRAGOŞ

Abstract


The article discusses the new developments in the public procurement system triggered by the empowerment of the National Council for Solving Administrative Disputes (an administrative body) as the only first instance review body for remedies before the conclusion of public procurement contracts. The legislative development entails discussions regarding the constitutionality of the solution and also about the efficiency of subjecting complainants to an administrative body instead of courts. The conclusion of the study highlights the fact that the search for effectiveness in awarding contracts (mainly for the purpose of spending the structural funds) is pushing the Government towards unconstitutional solutions like the one promoted recently, regardless of the constant probability of such provisions being ousted by the Constitutional Court on the basis of open access to justice principle enshrined in our Constitution


Keywords


alternative dispute, public procurement, Romania, general administrative appeal, pre-trial procedures

Full Text:

PDF
Creative Commons License
Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences by TRAS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://rtsa.ro/tras/


Online ISSN: 2247-8310 | Print ISSN: 1842-2845 |  © AMP

The opinions expressed in the texts published are the author’s own and do not necessarily express the views of TRAS editors. The authors assume all responsibility for the ideas expressed in the materials published.