Effects of Participatory Budgeting and Transparency on Budget Allocation Outcomes in South Korea

Heontae Shin, B. Shine Cho, Youngmin Oh

Abstract


Despite a growing literature stream, debates con­tinue regarding the effects of citizen participation in public budgeting on budget allocation outcomes. This study addresses this research gap by analyzing data from the early stages of mandatory participa­tory budgeting implementation in South Korea and providing empirical evidence. It examines the effects of two independent variables: participatory budget­ing maturity and enhanced transparency through information disclosure. These factors are hypothe­sized to influence budget allocation by shifting de­cision-making power from bureaucrats to citizens. This study models these effects as sequential in­teractions, showing that increased citizen involve­ment results in a statistically significant increase in social expenditures, including welfare, education, and health services, while having a smaller effect on administrative expenses. Information disclosure fur­ther reduces participation costs, thereby enhancing the overall effect of participatory budgeting on pro­moting more equitable public resource distribution.

Keywords


participatory budgeting; transparency; budgeting allocation; sequential game; South Korea.

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.76E.8 Creative Commons License
Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences by TRAS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://rtsa.ro/tras/


Online ISSN: 2247-8310 | Print ISSN: 1842-2845 |  © AMP

The opinions expressed in the texts published are the author’s own and do not necessarily express the views of TRAS editors. The authors assume all responsibility for the ideas expressed in the materials published.