Registration Level and Nonprofit Foundation Efficiency: The Moderating Role of Organizational Income

Sujie Peng, Xiang Li, Yuling Pang

Abstract


Nonprofit foundations are becoming significant stakeholders in global governance and business operations. However, measuring their efficiency is a challenging task due to their mission-driven nature. This study aims to investigate the factors influencing the program efficiency of nonprofit foundations in China. A set of indicators are employed and tested using data from the Chinese Research Data Services (CNRDS) platform. The study employs multiple regression analysis to examine the influential factors identified in the dataset. The study’s findings suggest a positive and significant correlation between registration level and nonprofit efficiency (program and administrative efficiency). Furthermore, organizational income appears to moderate the impact of registration level on both program and administrative efficiency. The results of the analysis provide valuable insights for nonprofit foundation operators, policymakers, and researchers in the field of the nonprofit sector (e.g., nonprofit foundations in China are encouraged to find an equilibrium between their organizational efficiency and their registration status). In terms of theoretical contributions, this study stands as one of the pioneering efforts in investigating the influence of registration levels and the moderating effect of organizational income on nonprofit foundations’ efficiency. Finally, we have delineated its limitations and outlined avenues for future research.

Keywords


nonprofit foundation; registration level; program efficiency; administrative efficiency; moderating effect.

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.75E.5 Creative Commons License
Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences by TRAS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://rtsa.ro/tras/


Online ISSN: 2247-8310 | Print ISSN: 1842-2845 |  © AMP

The opinions expressed in the texts published are the author’s own and do not necessarily express the views of TRAS editors. The authors assume all responsibility for the ideas expressed in the materials published.