Reflecții despre regimul politic din România

Liviu Radu

Abstract


The problem of the leadership structures of human communities is more actual than ever since humanity is facing an ever-increasing number of challenges. Throughout recent history, countries developed three major types of political regimes: presidential, parliamentary, and semi-presidential. All these regimes are subject to criticism and each of them is proving to have advantages and disadvantages. The type of political system of Romania is yet a subject of debate. Although depending on various authors there are different criteria to include a certain political regime among parliamentary or semi-presidential types of the regime, I consider that according to the Constitution, Romania has a pure parliamentary form of government. Though, in practice, Romania seems to resemble what a number of specialists wrote about the French political system. That is, it alternates from a parliamentary to a presidential type of political regime.


Cuvinte cheie


parliamentarism; presidentialism; semi-presidentialism; leadership; divided legitimacy; democracy; reforms.

Text integral:

PDF

Referințe

  • În acest moment nu există referințe.

Creative Commons License
Revista Transilvană de Științe Administrative by RTSA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://rtsa.ro/rtsa

Electronic ISSN: 2247-8329 | Print ISSN: 1454-1378 |  © AMP

The opinions expressed in the texts published are the author’s own and do not necessarily express the views of TRAS editors. The authors assume all responsibility for the ideas expressed in the materials published.