ROMANIAN STREET LEVEL BUREAUCRACY: A DESCRIPTIVE FOUNDATION

Dan Octavian BALICA, Alexander HENDERSON, Tudor Cristian ȚICLĂU

Abstract


Despite our relatively broad and robust understanding of street level bureaucracy in a Western context, this area of inquiry remains somewhat understudied in an Eastern European context. This is particularly problematic for Romania, where poor educational stock, weak accountability mechanism, and rather frail media make front line bureaucrats’ behavior disproportionately critical to public service provision. This article partially fills this void and brings a much
needed overview of street-level bureaucracy in Romania. Relying on recent survey data collected from 407 front line workers, the study covers four key public administration services (taxation, consumer, environmental, and labor protection) and street-level bureaucracy, describes demographics, values, work environment, and attitudes towards rules and citizens. It shows that Romanian front line workers are relatively willing to bend and break the rules if their organizational goals demand so, and that they enjoy important levels of discretion and work autonomy. These bureaucrats also depict high levels of organizational commitment, low levels of uncertainty tolerance, and high power distance. The article concludes with comments and implications for future research in policy implementation at the front lines.


Keywords


street-level bureaucracy; Romania; discretion; rule abidance; conformity; public sector motivation; power distance; uncertainty avoidance; goal ambiguity; organizational commitment.

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/tras.SI2018.1

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Creative Commons License
Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences by TRAS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://rtsa.ro/tras/


ISSN– L 2247 – 8310 | ISSN = 1842 – 2845 |  © AP

The opinions expressed in the texts published are the author’s own and do not necessarily express the views of TRAS editors. The authors assume all responsibility for the ideas expressed in the materials published.