Modele bicamerale comparate. Romania: Monocameralism versus bicameralism

Cynthia Carmen CURT


The paper attempts to evaluate the Romanian bicameral model as well as to identify and critically asses which are the options our country has in choosing between unicameral and bicameral system. The analysis attempts to observe the characteristics of some Second Chambers that are related to Romanian bicameralism by influencing the configuration of the Romanian bicameral legislature, or which devised constitutional mechanisms can be used in order to preserve an efficient bicameral formula. Also the alternative of giving up the bicameral formula due to some arguments related to the simplification and the efficiency of the legislative procedure is explored.

Text integral:



  • În acest moment nu există referințe.

Creative Commons License
Revista Transilvană de Științe Administrative by RTSA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at

ISSN – L = 2247 – 8329 | ISSN = 1454 – 1378 |  © AMP

The opinions expressed in the texts published are the author’s own and do not necessarily express the views of TRAS editors. The authors assume all responsibility for the ideas expressed in the materials published.